j s e t logo
JSET ejournal

Use browser
back arrow to return to your most recent page.

back to first page button
back to issue menu button

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

top of page button

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 


Site Link

 

 

 

top of page button

References




CAST. Assistive technologies and UDL. (n.d).Retrieved August 14, 2003, from http://www.cast.org/udl/AssistiveTechnologiesvs.UDL13.cfm

The Center for Universal Design (1997).The Principles of Universal Design, Version 2.0. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University. Retrieved August 14, 2003 from North Carolina State University College of Design, The Center for Universal Design Web site: http://www.design.ncsu.edu/cud/univ_design/princ_overview.htm

Freed, G., Rothberg, M., & Wlodkowski, T. (2003). Making Educational Software and Web Sites Accessible: Design Guidelines Including Math and Science Solutions. Boston, MA: The CTB/WBGH National Center for Accessible Media.

Hitchcock, C. (2001). Balanced Instructional Support and Challenge in Universally Designed Learning Environments. Journal of Special Education Technology, 16(4), 23-30.

Hitchcock, C., Meyer, A., Rose, D, & Jackson, R. (2002). Providing Access to the General Education Curriculum. Universal Design for Learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35(2), 8-17.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. §1400 et seq. (2000).

King-Sears, M. E. (1997). Best academic practices for inclusive practices. Focus on Exceptional Children, 29, 1-21.

Labbo, L., & Reinking, D. (1999). Negotiating the multiple realities of technology in literacy research instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 34(4), 478-492.

Mull, C., & Sitlington, P. (2003). The Role of Technology in the Transition to Postsecondary Education of Students with Learning Disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 37(1), 26-32.

NCAC. Effective classroom practices. (n.d). Retrieved August 14, 2003, from CAST, NCAC Web site: http://www.cast.org/ncac/index.cfm?i=2874.

NCAC. An overview ­ enhancements literature review. (n.d.). Retrieved August 14, 2003, from CAST, NCAC Web site: http://www.cast.org/ncac/EnhancementsLiteratureReview1660.cfm

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Public Law 107-110, 107th Cong., 1st Sess., (2001).
Nolet, V., & McLaughlin, M. J. (2000). Accessing the general curriculum: Including students with disabilities in student-based reform. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Rose, D. H. (2003). No Child with Disabilities Left Behind: Recommendations for the Reauthorization of IDEA, Unpublished policy paper, (1)

Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Stough, L., & Palmer D. (2003). Special Thinking in Special Settings: A Qualitative Study of Expert Special Educators. The Journal of Special Education, 36(4), 206-222.

Ysseldyke, J. (2001). Reflections on a Career: 25 Years of Research on Assessment and Instruction Decision Making. Exceptional Children, 67(3), 295-309.

top of page button
top of page