j s e t logo
JSET ejournal

this issue button
this volume button
email us button
about j s e t button
related links button


powerpoint presentations button
p d f files button

1999 in Review:
A Synthesis of the Special Education Technology Literature

 

Dave L. Edyburn
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee



An enduring characteristic of the human race has been the thirst for knowledge. This thirst has been well documented by the equally irrepressible urge to record (Hall & Brown, 1983). However, if the wealth of accumulated knowledge contained within our libraries is to be of any value, it must not only be stored, but consulted, and continuously updated (Bush, 1945). Our current abilities to make use of this body of knowledge appears severely impaired as a result of two significant factors: the ever increasing size of the information fund and the lack of powerful retrieval tools for accessing such a fund.

Large (1984) observed that (a) about 1,000 books are published internationally everyday, (b) more new information has been produced in the last 30 years than in the previous 5,000, and (c) that the total of all knowledge, in print, doubles every eight years. Indeed, professionals in all fields have noted the difficulty of maintaining current awareness in their disciplines. Wurman (1989) coined the term, "information anxiety," to describe tensions increasingly recognized in the information age. He defines the term as follows:
Information anxiety is produced by the ever-widening gap between what we understand and what we think we should understand. Information anxiety is the black hole between data and knowledge, and it happens when information doesn't tell us what we want or need to know (p. 34).

A second factor which impairs our ability to use the accumulated knowledge is the lack of powerful retrieval tools. Ahead of his time, Bush (1945) noted that our ability to extend the record has greatly surpassed his ability to consult and exploit the knowledge base in its bulk:
The summation of human experience is being expended at a prodigious rate, and the means we use for threading through the consequent maze to the momentarily important item is the same as was used in the days of square-rigged shops (p. 102).

Of course, as the information fund grows, it becomes more difficult to use it to locate specific information. Today, given the minimal skills required to use an Internet search engine, it is now possible for anyone to conduct a search on a topic and find millions of resources. Whereas technological advances have made it easier to access information, a fundamental challenge remains: identifying documents that are personally relevant.

Traditional Tools of Scholarship
One distinguishing characteristic of a scholar is their intimate knowledge and understanding of the published literature in their discipline. This knowledge has been traditionally acquired through reading and studying professional journals. In support of scholarship in special education, various facets of professional journals have been studied to gain insight about publishing opportunities (Joyce & Joyce, 1990), characteristics of the literature (Black, 1974; Summers, 1986; Torgeson & Dice, 1980; Vockell & Asher, 1972), rankings of professional journals (Garrett & McLoughlin, 1995, Swanson & Alford, 1987), quality of published works (Garrett & McLoughlin, 1995), and the impact of published works as represented through citation analysis (Swanson & Alford, 1987; Vockel & Jacobson, 1983).


references button

top of page button next page button
top of page | next page